Newsletter
No. 243
April 20, 2006
John
Edward Philips (Shingetsu Member No. 1) has been kind enough
to provide us an essay analyzing the crisis in Chad, and
suggestions about the Japanese interest in the country.
JAPAN
SHOULD NOT IGNORE THE CRISIS IN CHAD
By John Edward Philips
The
situation in Chad, and its proximity to the Darfur region
of the Sudan, has focused attention on a country that even
most Africanists pay little attention to. The country was
originally a province of French Equatorial Africa, stuck
at the far north of that colony, hopelessly landlocked and
generally inaccessible from the outside. It is one of the
most extremely artificial countries in Africa, a distinction
which is difficult to match. The population of perhaps 10
million is about half Muslim, half non-Muslim (concentrated
in the south) and comprises dozens of ethnic groups speaking
over a hundred different languages, including perhaps a
million speakers of the Chadian dialect of Arabic. Because
Arabic literacy is included in the official statistics,
the official literacy rate is nearly 50%, unusually high
for a Francophone African country, where usually only the
small minority who can read and write excellent French are
counted in the literacy statistics.
During
the 1970s there was much intrigue and jockeying for power,
which inevitably involved Libya, which borders Chad to the
north. This inevitably involved the United States, which
for many years had knee-jerk reactions against any initiatives
Libya undertook, and of course it also involved a unilateral
declaration of "unity" declared by Libya at one
point. Such declarations seem to have involved every country
bordering Libya at some time or other. Some of the northern
Saharan nomad groups also declared themselves a "National
Liberation Front" at one point in a transparent attempt
to get arms from Maoist China. I well remember one African
student I knew at UCLA shaking his head and complaining
that the fighting no longer involved even tribalism, it
was simply naked self-interest and ambition on the part
of the leaders.
Chad
seemed to settle down in the 1990s after Idriss Deby took
control of the capital and promised democracy. A national
conference was held in 1993, as in many Francophone African
countries, and established a transitional government with
Deby as interim president. Free elections were supposed
to be held within a year, but, as in many African countries,
the internationally recognized government in the capital
had incomplete control of the territory, and found that
an excuse to postpone the elections. Presidential and legislative
elections were finally held in 1996 and 1997 respectively,
returning Deby and his followers to office. Transparency
International often lists Chad as one of the most corrupt
countries in the world.
The
Chad government has been making a virtue out of a necessity
by hosting refugees from Darfur, whom it probably does not
have the power to effectively expel anyway, although it
could certainly make trouble for them. The government of
Chad has blamed unrest in the country on the Sudan, as Sudan
has blamed unrest in Darfur on Chad. It has threatened to
expel refugees if Sudan did not stop supporting rebels.
I am not sure how Sudan would oppose the refugees being
expelled back to its territory, since it seems to be supporting
those who are trying to kill them, but the threat seems
to have been addressed not so much to the Sudanese government
as to the UN and the African Union, which Deby insisted
should do something to stop the turmoil in Darfur. He has
since backed down, as neither the UN nor the AU seems to
have the means, or perhaps even the will, to do anything
about the ongoing genocide, much less the erosion of both
states which seems to be spreading from their common border.
Deby is Zaghawa, a group which is also found in Darfur,
and used Darfur as a base for his takeover of Chad, but
personal ambition probably has more to do with his policies
than ethnic loyalties.
How
does this affect Japan? One billion barrels of oil have
been discovered in southern Chad and exports began in 2004.
The World Bank helped build a pipeline on condition that
Chad use the proceeds for socially useful purposes. The
government is using the fighting to demand that it be allowed
to spend more of the proceeds from oil exports on arms.
The US is now trying to mediate between Chad and the World
Bank.
Japan
has an interest in Chad's oil, if not directly then at least
in having Chad's oil enter the market to exert downward
pressure on prices. It therefore has an interest in peace,
at least in the oil producing regions. The collapse of the
government would be in few other countries' interests. Sudan
might move against the refugee camps across the border,
and Libya might declare another union, but in the long run,
a vacuum in Chad would probably not even be in their interests
either.
States,
all states, are essentially armed bodies that monopolize
violence in a territory and use that violence to exact a
surplus to perpetuate themselves. The government of Chad
needs sufficient armed force to maintain itself, but the
amount of force necessary would be less if its people viewed
it as more legitimate. If people feel their government is
acting in their interest, that government will need less
force to get them to obey its dictates. Thus the struggle
for stability in Africa cannot be separated from the struggle
for democracy. The difficulty many states find in supporting
themselves suggests that it cannot be separated from the
struggle for African unity.
Whether
Japanese people, and the bureaucracy, know it or not, their
economic and even physical security is coming to depend
more and more on their ability to get accurate information
about, and carefully interact with, places as remote as
Chad. That will probably require not only an expansion but
also a complete overhaul of area studies in Japan.
For more information about Chad:
languages:
http://www.ethnologue.com/show_country.asp?name=Chad