Newsletter No. 992
News-Analysis
April 24, 2008
THE SELF-DEFENSE FORCES
FLEX THEIR NEWFOUND POLITICAL MUSCLE
I’m not quite sure why
so few people want to discuss this increasingly apparent development
in which the Defense Ministry and the Self-Defense Forces are
gaining a larger share of political power in Tokyo. I’m
not speaking primarily about the Shingetsu Membership here,
but more about the mass media. There’s a big story here
and, especially in the English-language media, no one seems
to be picking up on it. Perhaps I’m one of the first to
sense the broader issue.
SDF Joint Chief of Staff Admiral
Takashi Saito has now added his voice to those calling Judge
Kunio Aoyama’s verdict mistaken: “We have no operations
in combat zones.” This was obviously in contradiction
to what the judge has ruled.
In another apparent bid of defiance,
an LDP panel on Defense Ministry reform today recommended that
a new post might be created in which a uniformed SDF officer
would serve as a personal aide to the prime minister. According
to Kyodo News, this proposal is “a bid to strengthen
the power of uniformed officers in the ministry.” Another
reform that has just been proposed is to strengthen the authority
of the SDF Joint Chief of Staff by providing him with a new
command center and direct command of certain SDF units. This
is aimed at “speeding up the decision-making process in
a possible emergency.”
A Yomiuri Shinbun article
makes it clear that some high-ranking officers have greeted
Judge Aoyama’s ruling by making jokes about it to their
media friends. One such uniformed officer wisecracked: “Now
that it has come to this, we should sue the government for the
mental anguish we've experienced after engaging in activities
that are considered to be in violation of the Constitution!”
The Yomiuri also hints that
some SDF officers believe that they should create their own
legal case in order to give a more pliant court a chance to
overrule Judge Aoyama’s obiter dicta and thus
erase it from the law books. No doubt, the Tachikawa fliers
case gives them solid ground for predicting such a possibility.
How many other judges are there, one wonders, who have the courage
to rule against the government on such a major issue?
Meanwhile, in regard to the
rather outrageous Supreme Court ruling on the Tachikawa fliers
case itself, a group of 140 legal experts, led by Professor
Emeritus of Tokyo University Yasuhiro Okudaira and Professor
Emeritus of Tohoku University Toshiki Odanaka, issued a statement
on the 22nd protesting that verdict. Their statement was reported
as saying, “The Supreme Court has failed to make a convincing
case that the nonviolent act of distributing political fliers
deserved a criminal penalty… The court did not show how
the activists disturbed the private lives of [SDF personnel
and their families living in the apartment complex] by the distribution,
and it seems unreasonable to brand their act as a crime.”
Come now! Criminalizing the act of handing out antiwar fliers
to SDF families? Spying on peace groups? Growing links to fine
international role models like the Pakistani military? Mocking
civilian judges? A direct pipeline to the prime minister? Active
units under the direct command of the Chief of Staff?
Is this really a good start
for Japan’s new Ministry of Defense? Where are the effective
countervailing political forces here? What about the lessons
of Japanese history in the 20th century? If unchecked now, where
does this kind of thing lead in the future?
And why is the English-language
media still asleep on this?