Newsletter No. 882
News-Analysis
January 24, 2008
TOKYO SPEAKS OUT ON THE SEIGE OF GAZA
When both the New York Times and the
Japanese Foreign Ministry are moved to criticize a certain policy
of the Israeli government, then you’ve got to know that
it is really, really bad. Collective punishment of the Palestinian
community by the Israeli government has been going on for decades,
but apparently, the decision to cut fuel supplies to Gaza’s
power plant crossed a line that even the basically pro-Israeli
champions of the establishment could not safely ignore, especially
after watching ordinary Palestinians flood across the border
to Egypt to buy supplies for survival.
The Israeli government’s decision to cut
off fuel supplies to Gaza -- now clearly a PR disaster for them
-- was taken due to Hamas’ continuing use of rockets to
fire into Israel. There is no doubt that the Israelis were seriously
provoked by Hamas. At the same time, the continuing US-Israel-Tokyo
policy of ignoring Hamas and rejecting it as a legitimate spokesman
for a significant proportion of the Palestinian community has
given the Islamist party absolutely no incentive to moderate
their behavior.
The Israeli policy seems to be to make life
in Gaza so much of a hell that ordinary Palestinians will turn
against Hamas and just surrender themselves to the Israeli will.
The Hamas strategy is to use its incessant rocket attacks on
Israel to prove that they cannot be safely ignored, and that
their demands must be seriously addressed. The latest misstep
by the Israeli government and its negative international reception
seems to indicate that the Hamas strategy is gradually prevailing.
Readers of the Shingetsu Newsletter know that
I’ve been consistent in saying that any real peace negotiations
require Hamas to be at the table. I’ve taken some hits
over this position, but I note with satisfaction that even the
arch-conservative British paper The Telegraph has now
headlined one of its editorials, “Israel, the US and Egypt
Cannot Ignore Hamas.” It seems like the conventional wisdom
is slowly inching toward my position on this matter.
Abhorrent as Hamas may be to some, they are
a Palestinian political force that is not going to just disappear
because Israel or the Bush Administration wants them to. The
best way to really undermine Islamist radicalism is not collective
punishment of all Gazans (which actually strengthens the hand
of the radicals), but rather to treat all sides with respect
and dignity, and to make a fair-minded and just settlement to
the decades-old Arab-Israeli conflict. Take away the fears and
accommodate the legitimate Palestinian political grievances,
and then the hatreds and passions will begin to subside of their
own accord. If ordinary Palestinians feel that they’ve
been given a fair shake, then they themselves will stop supporting
the troublemakers, and a real peace will finally be achieved.
This should be common sense, but there are highly
influential political and cultural forces that still manage
to defeat common sense on this issue, and we all are paying
a very heavy price for that. I’ll truly welcome the day
when this patently solvable conflict is actually solved. But
for now, the needless suffering on all sides continues.
Turning once again to the specifics of the current
Japanese policy, MOFA released a statement on the 22nd expressing
its “deep concern” over the Gaza situation, calling
on “all parties” to step back from the confrontation.
The very fact that MOFA released such a statement is welcome.
It is much better than silence.
Still, the statement announces that they “support
the peace efforts of President Abbas,” but the name “Hamas”
doesn’t appear at all. I read this as yet another indication
that Tokyo still backs the US-Israeli policy of denying Hamas
any role as a legitimate interlocutor, and effectively demonstrates
that Tokyo is still supporting the boycott of the political
party which won the most recent Palestinian elections in early
2006.
Note to all concerned: It is for the Palestinian
people alone to choose their representatives.
The full MOFA statement is provided at the end
of this Newsletter.
Aid for Medical Services in the West Bank
On December 14th, MOFA announced emergency aid
of US$10 million through the UN to improve the medical situation
of Palestinians in the West Bank. The aid was targeted for medical
equipment and ambulances to Qalqiliya Hospital, construction
of additional floors for sickrooms and operation rooms in Jenin
Hospital and Tulkarem Hospital, and other similar projects in
the West Bank.
The Japanese government statement noted: “There
is a grave concern over the financial crisis of the Palestinian
Authority… Japan decided, therefore, extend this Emergency
Grant Aid for improving the medical situation of the Palestinians
in order to support the Palestinian Authority which is making
enormous efforts to promote the Peace Process.”
In other words, this is yet another aspect of
Tokyo’s policy to prop up the Abbas regime over its Hamas
rivals.
Statement by the Press Secretary on the Current Situation
in Israel and the Palestinian Territories
January 22, 2008
The Government of Japan expresses its deep concern
over the situation in the Gaza Strip, which threatens the lives
of many civilians both in Gaza and in Israel, and would negatively
affect the advancement of the Middle East Peace Process. The
Government of Japan deplores that attacks including firing of
the rockets from Gaza on Israeli territory are continuing, and
also deplores that Palestinian civilians have been falling victims
by the Israeli military operations and the closure of Gaza in
retaliation for the attacks from Gaza.
The Government of Japan calls on all the parties
concerned to avoid the further deterioration of the humanitarian
situation in Gaza, and support the peace efforts of President
Abbas of the Palestinian Authority. The Government of Japan
also calls on both the Israeli and the Palestinian sides to
exercise their utmost self-restraint to achieve a peace agreement
by the end of this year. Japan will continue to support to the
greatest extent possible the efforts towards the advancement
of the Middle East Peace Process.