Newsletter
No. 261
May 7, 2006
THE
PERCEPTION OF ISLAM IN JAPANESE SCHOOLS
Toru
Miura (Shingetsu Member No. 8) is a Professor at Ochanomizu
University in Tokyo, and has been serving this past
year as President of the Japan Association for Middle
East Studies (JAMES). In the most recent issue of AJAMES
-- the main journal of this academic society -- Professor
Miura and Takaaki Matsumoto, a high school teacher,
have published the results of their surveys on the image
of Islam in Japanese schools.
Clearly,
this is a very important branch of study that has important
ramifications for present and future Japanese-Islamic
relations. Together with the media, it is perhaps our
schools that do the most to shape public views about
the world beyond our immediate experience. What did
Miura and Matsumoto find?
There
are three short articles in AJAMES No. 21-2 on this
topic. The first is a short introduction by Professor
Miura. He calls attention to public statements issued
by JAMES in recent years. Immediately after September
11, this scholarly community issued a statement that
read, in part:
“We
suggest that our attitude towards the Middle East and
the Islamic World thus far, characterized by unconcern
and inadequate understanding, may have played a part
[in the tragedy]. And sadly, the event of September
11 may cause even more apathy and less understanding,
instead of marking a change in attitude.”
At
the time of the US-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003,
JAMES issued another statement bewailing the quality
of the discussions on the Iraq issue:
“The
same is true for Japan, where it was discussed in the
frame of Japan-U.S. relations and international cooperation
either for the war or against it. The discussion among
politicians and specialists continues to depend on the
simple categories of dictatorship, terrorism, and Islam,
and they do not pay attention to the complex realities
in the Middle East.”
After
the introduction comes Professor Miura’s main
study.
The
surveys were conducted at both the high school and university
levels in the Tokyo area. He found that about half of
the students were interested in September 11. No less
than 92% of high school students and 78% of university
students said that television was their main source
of media information about these issues.
In
high school, only 39% of students could identify Muhammad,
Mecca, and the Koran, but the figure rose to 95% in
the university survey. High school students had trouble
identifying which countries are Muslim: Only 61% knew
that Egypt was a Muslim-majority country, and only 42%
knew that Indonesia had a Muslim majority.
The
high school students commonly held negative images of
Islam, as follows:
75%
-- Aggressive
72% -- Strange Customs
70% -- Unfree
69% -- Mysterious
59% -- Intolerant
54% -- Rigid Doctrine
53% -- Backward
On
the other hand, the survey found that student images
of Christianity and Buddhism were much more positive.
Interestingly, the students whose basic knowledge about
Islam was somewhat stronger tended to have more negative
views of Islam than those young ones who knew almost
nothing.
Miura
points out that some high school textbooks on religion
and ethics have descriptions like, “the belief
and doctrine of Islam has been established in severe
natural conditions (of the desert) and characteristics
of strictness and strength, quite different from the
Japanese preference for mildness, warmth, and ambiguity.”
And
yet, by and large the high school textbooks surveyed
by Miura seemed to offer a basically fair description
of medieval Islam, although they were much weaker on
modern history.
Miura
concludes by attempting to answer why the generally
decent textbooks have not changed negative student attitudes
toward Islam. He points to several issues, but his most
interesting statement is the following:
“One
reason is the gap between the school textbook and information
on the contemporary Muslim world in the mass media --
in other words, a gap between scholarship and Japanese
society. The scholars have been isolated from the mass
media, insisting on accurate knowledge to understand
Islam and the Middle East, while journalists are in
turn isolated from scholarship even when it is in Japan.
School teachers are isolated from them both and have
no way to bridge the gap of the two worlds. The stereotyped
images and knowledge are therefore reproduced in each
world.”
The
third paper is written in Japanese by Takaaki Matsumoto,
but has a brief English summary. This paper describes
the survey that was conducted among high school students
in Tokyo and Kanagawa. It was this survey that formed
the basis for much of Professor Miura’s discussion
above.
Matsumoto
does make one interesting point in his paper. He clarifies
that Japanese high school students have four predominant
images of Islam:
1)
Rigid, many commandments, and not free
2) Strange and incomprehensible
3) Intolerant and aggressive
4) Bearded people living in desert areas
The Shingetsu Institute was founded in part to try to
create a more positive relationship between Japan and
the Islamic world. Our statement in this respect is
available on the front page of our website. The studies
of Professor Miura and Mr. Matsumoto are sobering reminders
of how much still needs to be done.