Newsletter
No. 745
News-Analysis
September 20, 200
RUSSIA PROVIDES POLITICAL COVER FOR OZAWA AND THE DEMOCRATS
American diplomacy
takes another black eye. Although I’m sure that most of
the conservative media will spin this as a victory for Tokyo,
what went down in the UN Security Council today was largely
a benefit to the position of Ichiro Ozawa and the Democratic
Party of Japan (DPJ).
We discussed yesterday
the fact that the US (together with Britain and France)
was preparing to insert a message of “gratitude” to countries
participating in Operation Enduring Freedom in the preamble
of a new resolution to extend the International Security
Assistance Force (ISAF) mission in Afghanistan. The real
message, however, was a poisoned arrow aimed straight at
the heart of Ichiro Ozawa and the DPJ. Washington wanted
to demonstrate the international legitimacy of Operation Enduring Freedom by gaining the full sanction of the UN
Security Council. In this way, they hoped to undermine Ozawa’s
contention that the Indian Ocean mission was not UN-authorized.
Indeed, US Ambassador to the UN Zalmay
Khalilzad was explicit in the
linkage to Japan: “This is an opportunity for the Security
Council to underscore the importance of this mission and
to express by that recognition the appreciation that we
all have for the important contribution that Japan is making.”
Defense Minister Masahiko Komura also observed: “If the
resolution is adopted, then the DPJ will lose its largest
grounds for opposing Japan's participation.”
We had originally
heard that this matter would be voted on next week, but
in fact it was done today. As expected, the UN Security
Council authorized another year for the ISAF mission. The
shocker, however, is that Russia actually abstained on the
vote, and Ambassador Vitaly Churkin
made it clear as to why. He spoke to reporters along the
following lines: “Russia strongly backs the ISAF mission
to fight terrorism in Afghanistan, but we have abstained
after the sponsors did not take into account suggestions
we and others made to clarify why a certain paragraph was
inserted into the text… A decision was made to give priority
to domestic considerations of some members of the United
Nations. The unity of the Security Council has been sacrificed
to undue haste.”
Although his language
is coy, it is perfectly obvious that he is referring to
the way that the Washington is trying to use the “message
of gratitude” to interfere in internal Japanese politics,
and that is why Russia chose to abstain (for the first time)
on a resolution authorizing the ISAF mission.
Churkin also said the following: “We believe that the maritime component
is necessary exclusively to combat terrorism in Afghanistan
and should not be used for other purposes.” I read that
as meaning that it is Russia’s understanding that the MSDF
is indeed refueling US warships bound for the Iraq War and
not only Afghanistan, just as Representative Kenji Eda has been asserting.
A
Russian abstention and a veiled confirmation that the MSDF
is supporting Iraq War operations?
Once again, it is clear that US diplomats have bungled.
Shouldn’t they have made sure that Russia was on board before
going to a vote? Did they think that the Russians would
just swallow it if they forced it through, and then stay
quiet? Well, now the symbolic message that Washington wanted
to convey to the DPJ has actually backfired and -- hey!
-- it looks like the Yomiuri is
wrong and Russia is still a “key member” of the UN Security
Council after all!
China voted for the
resolution, but also “expressed concern” over the way it
had been drafted.
DPJ Leaders Believe that Fukuda Will Back Off
There is an article
in today’s Asahi which is startling if true. It seems that
Ichiro Ozawa and the DPJ have calculated that Yasuo
Fukuda will not make passage of the MSDF extension bill
his top priority this year, and that in fact the DPJ may
have already won the battle in the near term. Apparently,
Defense Minister Masahiko Komura told reporters on the 18th
that the LDP would not try to pass the MSDF extension right
away, and will wait until next January to make their big
push. If so, that settles the fact that the MSDF will withdraw
from its Indian Ocean operations in October, and will not
return until next year (if at all).
If Fukuda decides
that he needs to build a cooperative relationship with the
DPJ in order to pass the fiscal 2008 government budget and
other matters, could the political battle over the MSDF
Indian Ocean mission already be over in spite of all the
tough talk?
KENSHIRO MATSUNAMI IN AFGHANISTAN
Deputy Minister of
Education Kenshiro Matsunami
is appearing in several Pakistani and Afghan news reports,
thus making it clear that he has been on a visit to Afghanistan
this week. Matsunami (Osaka 19th
District) is a colorful figure. Aside from being associated
with Afghanistan friendship organizations, he is also a
former wrestler who actually taught at Kabul University
from 1975 to 1977. He was Japan’s representative to the recent funeral
of Zahir Shah. He used to be a
key figure in the now-defunct New Conservative Party, but
is currently with the LDP. Matsunami has been involved in several scandals, including
one linking him to the yakuza and another in which he threw
water at opposition lawmakers during a heated Diet debate.
He is also famous for the ponytail that he wears.
At any rate, Matsunami said that Japan’s withdrawal from Afghanistan would
harm bilateral relations, and was able to elicit comments
of support for the MSDF mission from several Afghan politicians.
For example, Mir Wais Yasini, member of the Wolesi Jirga from Nangarha, was quoted
as saying: “Afghanistan and Japan were enjoying old and
strong ties. Disapproving the law by Japanese parliamentarians
will create negative effects on the war against terror.”
Similar comments have recently come from Afghan Ambassador
in Tokyo Haron Amin
and Afghan Foreign Minister Rangin
Dadfar Spanta.
Matsunami has also been quoted as saying that Japan would fund the construction
of a gymnasium for girls in Kabul. There are currently no
public sports facilities for girls in Afghanistan.
|
|